
If this is the case, then of course we are not going to agree on what gear is "the best" for any given situation. Panasonic 24mm and 35mm Shootout Panasonic S 24mm F1.8 sample gallery (DPReview TV). Released: NIK collection 6, ON1 Resize AI v2023.5, Capture One v16.2. This is Sigma L-mount Lens Roadmap Started Discussions thread Forum: Parent: First: Previous: Next: Flat view: ProDude. More leaked pictures of the upcoming HD PENTAX-FA 50mm f/1.4 and smc PENTAX-FA 50mm f/1.4 Classic lenses. You tend to be more "normal", and seem to take pleasure in things, even if they aren't absolutely perfect. HD PENTAX-FA 50mm f/1.4 and smc PENTAX-FA 50mm f/1.4 Classic lenses officially announced. I tend to be a perfectionist who is almost never happy or satisfied with anything.

Perhaps our objectives are different, which would result in us having different opinions on the same issues. I have read everything you have written here with great care and precise attention to the way you have worded everything, and I have responded accordingly. In those situations, which are quite prevalent, then gear does become the thing that must be depended on when we have a certain result in mind, and the conditions are not conducive to giving us that result. Often times, the conditions that we have to shoot in, and the position that we have to shoot from, are "given", and we are simply not permitted to do anything different. If a feeder is set up just 4 feet in front of a nasty background, and one is not allowed to tamper with any of the vegetation or perches, and one is not allowed to approach beyond the boundary rope that is set up, then one must rely on gear to get things "more blurry". I also realize there are times when the conditions presented to a photographer are far less than ideal, and there is nothing one can do, or is allowed to do, to change the conditions in which one must shoot. I understand the "rules" of depth of field.
Sigma lens roadmap 2021 professional#
And his work is lets say, of a professional level. I think its safe to say his portfolio debunks many of the myths you are spewing here. care to elaborate there? 30cm, 50cm, several metres?īelow is the website of a professional photographer who uses Fujifilm, his longest lens is 400mm and f5.6, the sensor is APS-C.


Hey, I get it, you don't want to listen, its ok, lets end the conversation here because I have better things to do with my time than try to converse with ignorant people who don't actually read the comments they are responding to.Įdit: I see you have edited your comment, the 'wasn't too far behind' part. Ive already addressed that point above too. It seems you lack understanding of basic depth of field rules, instead claiming its 'the gear'Īnd yeah, 800mm is going to produce a shallower depth of field than 420mm, that's a bit of a 'no shit Sherlock' comment there isn't it. I was 6m away from the bird, the background was 1m away from the bird. As ive already said, much of this was down to composition and not following the basic rules of subject and background distance.
